Google is closing in on black hat SEO practices

Published on
by Brafton Editorial
Remember those gray hat links you let slip through the cracks that one time? They might drastically impact your SEO rankings now that Google's spam hunt is closing in.

Google has explicitly stated its policy regarding web spam: Any site caught using black hat SEO strategies to game the system risks falling off the face of SERPs.

So Matt Cutts was surprised when a webmaster wrote in to ask whether his site stood a chance against competitors actively using spam techniques to improve ranking signals before admitting his own site had hired an SEO firm that used questionable practices to generate spam backlinks. Cutts assures the webmaster that “the good guys,” or those using purely white hat practices, can certainly beat larger spammy domains, but not with a tarnished SEO record.

Guilt by spammy association

Cutts’ response in the Webmaster Help Channel video demonstrates that sites don’t necessarily need to be engaged in black hat techniques at present to be penalized. They are neither absolved of responsibility for any deceptive practices conducted by another SEO agency, even if they originally had good intentions. This should encourage marketers to take a look at the company they keep and consider whether those associations and partnerships are purely positive.

“The good guys stand a chance IF they don’t spam.”

“You might consider yourself the good guys, but you spammed. So the other people might consider you a bad guy. And the fact that you got caught meant – hey, other good guys who didn’t spam can rank higher,” Cutts said. “The good guys stand a chance IF they don’t spam.”

The outcome this webmaster described is becoming more common as Google buckles down in its crusade to prevent cheaters from taking top search results.

Google won’t ignore your small-scale act

Even the smallest businesses are being put under a microscope to spot spammy practices. One company in a similar position had worked with an SEO who was actively guest blogging on behalf of the business. Long after ending the partnership with this individual (and receiving hundreds of links with keyword-rich anchor text), the business received a manual webspam penalty through Google’s Webmaster Tools.

 

It performed some link cleansing and attempted to remove links that were blatantly spammy before submitting a reconsideration request. But Google came back with another notification, alerting the company it was still in violation of link best practices and provided three examples of damaging links. One of these examples pointed back to a site where the SEO had been publishing (hundreds of) guest blogs.

The business is now left with no choice but to go back and do the difficult back-end work, removing questionable links and cleaning up any search optimization practices that could be considered questionable. In the video, Cutts explains that Google is cracking down, and approaches that once flew under the radar will no longer fly in search results.

Enjoy our news? Subscribe to the Content Marketzine!
  Daily   Weekly

  • John Martin

    Its really a sign of relief for White Hat SEOs. Thank you Google!

  • http://www.riverbedmarketing.com/ Todd Mumford

    Good read guys. One point to add – it’s all about intent, and Google has access to whois account information, so if your brand focuses on cleanup, be sure you are “walking the walk” with all of your online properties.

  • Brett Tudor

    Ok so Google punishes websites that have kots of spammy links pointing at them. Sounds reasonable until you look at the other side of it, what happens if a business decides to point hundreds of spammy links at their rival? Surely there must be some margin for error built in to prevent innocent website owners getting penalised? If this was actually the case then there would be complete chaos on the Internet.

    • Liam Chapman

      One of my forum members has recently suffered negative SEO by link spam. They received an email saying they would spam his site using Xrumer if he did not pay $200. With good reason he didn’t pay and the spam came flooding in. As advised he made a record of the spammy links and disavowed them as soon as they came in. I even mentioned he post on Google Webmaster forum so that Google have a record to show he is not making the spam. To cut a long story short, His site has practically lost all search visibility so he is now waiting to see what happens when Google catch up on the disavowed links. What sucks the most is he just spent $3k having the site built.

      Google really need to sort out what they are doing. Sure combat link spam but they have made a new industry in negative SEO which will result in more link spam.

  • http://www.rankgiant.com/ www.rankgiant.com

    Then it will act as judge, jury and executioner without even telling you
    that you under suspicion until they penalize your site and endanger
    your business.

  • brandonds

    Google should just let the public pick, they need to work closely with social networks since they are the people and if they share it then it’s worth reading. Shouldn’t be that hard to determine which sites gain them unaturally and let their search engine rank sites correctly and none of that low authority garbage will come up along with the garbage backlinks from doodoo sites